Test how well you apply eeat signals: building expertise, experience, authority & trust in real projects. Each question reflects current Google guidance and accepted practice.
Which statement accurately describes E‑E‑A‑T in 2025?
It’s a framework reflected in quality signals, not a single direct ranking factor
It replaces all core updates
It’s a numeric score used directly for ranking
It guarantees rich results
Which practice most directly demonstrates ‘Experience’ in reviews/tutorials?
Hiding author identity
Providing first‑hand details and original evidence of use
Using only stock images
Summarizing other posts without citation
For people‑first content, which self‑check aligns with current guidance?
Publish misleading claims for clicks
Ask if the page is primarily for users rather than to manipulate rankings
Prioritize keyword density over clarity
Hide affiliate relationships
Which element strengthens ‘Authority’ for a medical article?
Sensational title with thin content
Irrelevant citations
Anonymous byline
Clear author credentials and relevant expertise
What does Google recommend disclosing about how content is produced when relevant?
Disclose nothing about methods
Explain Who created it, How it was created, and Why
Only disclose if sponsored
Hide the use of assistive tools
Which statement best reflects core update guidance tied to E‑E‑A‑T?
Thin rewrites outperform originals
Focus on helpful, reliable content; updates don’t target specific sites
Only fix CWV to recover
Acquire links regardless of quality
For YMYL topics, which approach is aligned with E‑E‑A‑T expectations?
Offer financial advice without disclaimers
Skip medical qualifications entirely
Provide accurate, well‑referenced advice with appropriate disclosures
Use sensationalism to drive clicks
Which signal most likely hurts perceived trust?
Accessible author bios
Properly labeled sponsorships
Accurate update dates
Misleading titles that don’t match on‑page content
What practice supports ongoing ‘Trust’ after publication?
Never revise outdated claims
Keep pages updated and fix inaccuracies promptly
Remove dates to appear evergreen
Block reader feedback
Which is the safest way to support claims for trust?
Rely only on private sources
Use expired screenshots instead of links
Hide sources to deter competitors
Link to primary or authoritative references for key assertions
Starter
Good start. Review the fundamentals of EEAT Signals and retest after fixes.
Solid
Nice work. Tighten weak spots and align with current guidance for consistent wins.
Expert!
Outstanding mastery of EEAT Signals. Keep shipping playbooks and share benchmarks.
