Product Life-Cycle & Portfolio

End-of-Life Compliance and Reverse Logistics

Plan the tail of the product life to meet regulations and recover value at scale. Design for take‑back, traceability, and safe disposition to reduce risk and cost.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) primarily shifts ______.

end‑of‑life obligation and financing to producers

tax filings to recyclers

safety certification to logistics firms

all warranty claims to retailers

EPR laws make manufacturers responsible for take‑back and recycling costs. This changes design and reverse‑logistics economics.

WEEE frameworks require producers to ______.

eliminate lithium batteries entirely

finance collection and proper recycling of electrical equipment

ship all returns to landfills

provide lifetime free repairs

Producer responsibility includes funding collection systems and compliant treatment. Landfilling is generally restricted or banned.

RoHS restrictions target substances such as ______.

silicon, carbon, and iron

water, sugar, and salt

oxygen, nitrogen, and argon

lead, mercury, and cadmium

RoHS limits hazardous substances common in electronics to reduce environmental and health impacts. Compliance affects components and suppliers.

Designing for end‑of‑life, a practical disassembly choice is to prefer ______.

permanent adhesives everywhere

tamper‑proof potted assemblies

hidden fasteners under glass

standard fasteners and accessible modules

Accessible fasteners reduce time and damage during repair and recycling. Permanent bonds raise cost and safety risk.

For returns containing user data, a compliant step before resale or recycling is ______.

declaring devices “as‑is”

changing wallpaper only

media sanitisation aligned to a recognised standard

removing the SIM card alone

Certified sanitisation prevents data leakage and legal exposure. Cosmetic resets are insufficient for sensitive data.

Reverse‑logistics performance is best tracked with ______.

developer story points

office snack spend

number of meeting invites

recovery yield %, turnaround time, and cost per return

Yield, speed, and unit cost show value recovery and efficiency. They enable continuous improvement in take‑back operations.

A robust take‑back program often improves compliance by offering ______.

shipping charges to customers

verbal promises only

trade‑in credits or prepaid return labels

unlimited cash refunds without returns

Incentives and frictionless returns raise participation rates. That increases recovered material and reduces improper disposal.

Battery‑containing products should be designed so that cells can be ______.

incinerated with general waste

removed safely for separate handling and recycling

left installed during shredding

shipped at any state of charge

Safe removal reduces fire risk and enables compliant battery treatment. Mishandling cells can violate transport and safety rules.

End‑of‑life notices to customers typically include ______.

confidential supplier contracts

last‑buy dates and supported firmware timelines

ad copy approvals

internal salary bands

Clear sunset timelines allow orderly transitions and spares planning. Transparency reduces service disruption and risk.

Serialization and material traceability help reverse logistics by ______.

eliminating the need for RMAs

linking returns to origin, warranty, and material content

bypassing customs entirely

increasing marketing impressions

Traceability speeds triage and ensures compliance with content and warranty rules. It reduces fraud and rework.

Starter

Refresh EPR basics and design‑for‑disassembly to boost compliance.

Solid

Nice—optimise recovery yield and timelines across your take‑back chain.

Expert!

Outstanding—your program balances regulation, safety, and value recovery.

What's your reaction?

Related Quizzes

1 of 10

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *