Value Proposition Design

“Jobs to Lose” – When Your Solution Removes Work

Spot where your product removes tasks, handoffs, or decisions that customers dislike. Turn eliminated work into a clear value promise with proof on time saved and error reduction.

What qualifies as a ‘job to lose’ in JTBD terms?

Tasks customers prefer not to do and are happy to offload to the product

New features customers dream about

Brand stories customers like to hear

Upgrades customers rarely notice

Jobs to lose are activities users would willingly eliminate; removing them creates strong pull.

Which evidence best proves a job to lose was removed?

Positive survey adjectives

Measured reduction in steps, time, or errors in the target workflow

More menu items in the UI

Longer onboarding guides

Behavioral metrics demonstrate the work truly vanished rather than being re‑labeled.

A solution auto‑fills forms from verified data. Which primary value prop matches?

Fewer handoffs and lower error rates in critical submissions

Longer confirmation emails

More tooltips

Brighter UI colors

Automating data entry removes tedious steps and reduces costly mistakes.

Which pricing aligns with removing work from users?

Paywalls on help content

Per‑seat for read‑only roles

Outcome‑linked pricing (per task completed or errors avoided)

Flat fees unrelated to usage

Pricing tied to reduced work or risk signals confidence and aligns incentives.

Which adoption metric best signals eliminated work?

Total logins per week rise

Higher page scroll depth

Cycle time from start to done drops materially for the ICP

More tabs visited

Shorter cycle times reflect removal of friction and unnecessary tasks.

A feature removes approvals; risk team worries. What’s the right mitigation?

Hide changes from admins

Disable logs entirely

Ignore risk feedback

Add guardrails: thresholds, audit trails, and reversible actions

Risk‑aware design preserves safety while reducing unnecessary work.

Which message best communicates jobs to lose?

“Modern design and friendly colors.”

“Close invoices in 1 step—no rekeying, no back‑and‑forth.”

“Now with more tabs.”

“We added a knowledge base.”

Concrete elimination of steps is clearer than generic UI claims.

Which cohort pattern fits eliminated work?

Higher variance due to confusion

Only more visits with no throughput gain

No change in completion time

Lower variance in completion times after activation

Consistent speed suggests fewer blockers and fewer manual detours.

What is a common anti‑pattern when trying to remove work?

Providing optional shortcuts

Explaining limits of automation

Offering manual override

Hiding necessary steps behind opaque automation

Opaque automation undermines trust; users need visibility and control for edge cases.

Which sales proof supports the claim ‘we remove work’?

Office tour videos

Time‑and‑motion study or RCT showing fewer steps and lower rework

Slogan testing

Brand awards

Direct observation or experiments provide credible evidence of eliminated tasks.

Starter

You see where work is removed; quantify it and tie it to outcomes next.

Solid

Good—translate fewer steps into time, cost, and risk reductions customers feel.

Expert!

Excellent—your value story converts eliminated work into measurable business impact.

What's your reaction?

Related Quizzes

1 of 10

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *