Product Life-Cycle & Portfolio

Managing Feature Creep Without Stalling Releases

Keep release cadence by controlling scope with guardrails such as WIP limits, clear policies, and a solid Definition of Done. Use release trains or trunk‑based practices to ship small, high‑quality increments consistently.

Feature creep is best described as ______.

increasing test automation coverage

removing obsolete features to simplify UX

reducing work‑in‑progress to improve flow

unplanned scope growth that dilutes focus and delays releases

Creep adds items beyond agreed scope, stretching timelines and adding risk. Simplification or flow control are the opposite behaviors.

Which Kanban control directly limits overload and protects cadence?

QA after every six sprints only

daily standups lasting 60 minutes

infinite backlog grooming

work‑in‑progress (WIP) limits

WIP limits cap concurrent work, creating a pull system that shortens cycle times. Meetings or deferred testing do not enforce flow.

A Definition of Done (DoD) primarily ensures that each increment is ______.

larger than the previous increment

estimated with perfect accuracy

releasable against agreed quality criteria

approved by every stakeholder by consensus

DoD provides a shared quality bar so increments can ship confidently. It is not about estimation precision or size inflation.

To avoid stalling, a proven release pattern is to ______.

merge long‑lived branches once per quarter

batch all testing at project end

delay releases until every stakeholder request fits

ship on a fixed train cadence and move scope between trains

Release trains preserve cadence—scope flexes, not dates. Long‑lived branches and big‑bang testing raise integration risk.

Trunk‑based development reduces feature‑creep risk mainly by ______.

encouraging small, frequent integrations with short‑lived branches

enforcing multi‑month hardening phases

requiring manual merges only

forbidding feature flags

Small batches keep integration issues visible and manageable. Big‑bang merges and long hardening phases hide risk.

A practical policy to keep scope in check is a ______.

no documentation for scope decisions

formal change‑control gate with impact assessment

ad‑hoc approvals via chat reactions

silent backlog edits during sprints

Explicit change control forces trade‑off clarity and protects plans. Informal edits undermine predictability.

Which flow metric directly shortens when WIP limits are respected?

CPC

story points per sprint must always rise

domain authority

cycle time

Lower WIP reduces multitasking and queues, shortening cycle time. Marketing metrics and arbitrary point increases are unrelated.

What’s a release‑safe way to include a contentious feature?

block the train until all debate ends

ship it to all users without telemetry

hide it behind a feature flag and ship dark

merge it untested on release day

Flags decouple deploy from release and allow staged rollout. Blocking trains or risky merges increase failure odds.

A healthy DoD typically includes ______.

release notes after the quarter closes

manual regression only

brand‑new scope added mid‑sprint

automated tests, security checks, and documentation updates

Quality gates reduce rework and production risk. Late documentation and manual‑only testing slow learning and delivery.

To keep cadence after a high‑risk change, teams should ______.

use progressive delivery and monitor telemetry post‑release

freeze releases for the rest of the quarter

skip monitoring to avoid false alarms

increase WIP to catch up

Staged rollouts with observability contain impact and sustain cadence. Freezes, no monitoring, or higher WIP reduce flow and safety.

Starter

You understand the anti‑patterns. Tighten WIP limits and make your policies and DoD explicit.

Solid

Nice. Now automate checks, measure flow metrics, and protect the release cadence.

Expert!

Superb. You’re using flow discipline and small batches to deliver without bloat.

What's your reaction?

Related Quizzes

1 of 10

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *