Storytelling & Copywriting

Personalisation Tokens Without Creepiness

Personalisation should feel helpful, never invasive. Use tokens with consent, tasteful context and graceful fallbacks.

For first‑name tokens, a sensible frequency guideline is to ______.

avoid it entirely because names always reduce clicks

use sparingly—once is plenty unless context truly warrants more

use it only in the unsubscribe link

repeat it in every sentence for rapport

Names can humanise, but overuse feels manipulative. Reserve for moments where it genuinely clarifies who you’re addressing.

Which personal data should you avoid reflecting in copy without explicit, informed consent?

sensitive details like health status, finances or precise location

device type

time zone

preferred language

Sensitive categories heighten privacy risk and perceived intrusiveness. If used at all, they require explicit permission and clear value to the user.

Which personalisation style usually feels safest to new visitors?

referencing friends’ purchases by name

session or page‑context personalisation that doesn’t expose identity

importing external browsing history into copy

revealing hidden profile attributes in the hero text

On‑site context meets intent without oversharing. Pulling in third‑party or social graph data can feel intrusive and unnecessary.

To keep tokens from backfiring, your QA checklist should include ______.

disabling preview text so issues are hidden

hard‑coding a universal “Hi friend” for all users

tests for empty, null or malformed fields and readable fallbacks

adding more exclamation points to distract

Token hygiene prevents embarrassing errors and preserves credibility. Previewing dynamic fields under edge cases catches most issues pre‑send.

When a name token is missing, the most trustworthy fallback is to ______.

insert the person’s last name by default

replace it with an emoji to feel casual

use a neutral greeting that fits your brand

leave the field blank so it’s invisible

Graceful fallbacks avoid broken greetings like “Hi ,” and keep tone consistent. A neutral salutation maintains professionalism without guessing identity.

Which subject line is the least likely to feel invasive?

“Ideas to finish your project faster”

“We tracked you to this café—buy now”

“We watched you browse at 2:13 a.m.”

“You looked lost on our site last night”

Value‑focused phrasing avoids implying surveillance. Implicit monitoring language raises creepiness and may violate platform policies.

Which practice most reduces the “creepy factor” in personalised copy?

use precise location in the headline without asking

repeat the person’s name several times to feel friendly

hide personalisation so it feels “magical”

briefly explain why someone is seeing certain content and offer controls

Transparency and choice build trust and comply with modern consent expectations. Overuse of names or unexplained tracking does the opposite.

A good preference centre for personalisation should ______.

hide controls behind multiple clicks to reduce opt‑outs

bundle consent so unsubscribing also cancels the account

require phone number before any changes

let people opt in or out of behavioural tailoring separately from email subscription

Granular controls respect autonomy and reduce complaints. Bundling or obstructing choices risks non‑compliance and distrust.

What’s a respectful way to reference a user’s city in copy?

in every subject line to feel personalised

by inferring exact neighbourhood from IP without notice

only after consent and with a clear benefit for showing it

by mentioning nearby friends to boost social proof

Geographic personalisation should be permissioned and purposeful. Gratuitous or covert use of precise location reads as surveillance.

A safe default for first‑touch email personalisation is to ______.

open with an in‑joke that implies deep tracking

add a birthdate token to signal relevance

personalise by need or context (e.g., product category) before identity

mention pages viewed on other sites

Contextual relevance feels helpful without overreaching. Identity‑heavy details early on can trigger reactance and lower trust.

Starter

You’re learning how to personalise without crossing lines. Keep prioritising transparency and solid fallbacks.

Solid

Nice work. Tighten token hygiene and give users more control to raise trust.

Expert!

Stellar. Your personalisation feels helpful, respectful and clearly permissioned.

What's your reaction?

Related Quizzes

1 of 8

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *