Predictive / AI-Driven Analytics

Responsible AI: Bias Detection & Mitigation

Build models that are accurate and fair across groups. Compare common bias metrics and practical mitigation techniques for real deployments.

Demographic parity requires ______ across groups.

equal false‑negative rates only

similar positive prediction rates

identical ROC curves

the same feature distributions

It measures whether groups receive positive outcomes at comparable rates, regardless of ground truth.

Equalized odds focuses on matching ______ between groups.

feature importances

prevalence of the label

AUC scores

true‑positive and false‑positive rates

It conditions on the actual label and compares error rates, seeking parity in opportunity and mistakes.

A simple pre‑processing mitigation for biased features is ______.

reweighing or stratified sampling to rebalance groups

duplicating majority examples

dropping the label column

encrypting all features

Reweighing adjusts example importance so training sees balanced representation without changing labels.

Post‑processing methods like threshold optimization work by ______.

removing protected attributes from logs

setting group‑specific cutoffs to satisfy a chosen fairness metric

retraining the feature extractor only

randomizing labels during training

They alter decision thresholds at serve time to meet constraints such as parity or equalized odds.

Counterfactual fairness asks whether a prediction would stay the same if ______.

the sample size doubled

a protected attribute changed while everything else was held constant

features were sorted alphabetically

the model weights were randomized

It reasons about causal influence of sensitive attributes on individual decisions.

Simply dropping a protected attribute can fail because ______.

labels become undefined

privacy laws always require the attribute

models cannot train without it

other features may act as proxies that encode the same information

Correlated signals can leak sensitive data; mitigation needs deeper analysis than column removal.

To evaluate fairness reliably, teams should first ______.

use a single random split

define relevant groups and slice metrics by those segments

optimize only overall accuracy

remove all categorical features

Clear group definitions and sliced reports reveal disparities hidden in aggregate metrics.

Calibration can matter for fairness because poorly calibrated models ______.

reduce training speed only

guarantee demographic parity

produce scores that are not comparable across groups

always increase AUC

If scores have different meaning by group, thresholding yields uneven outcomes; calibration aligns scores.

Adversarial debiasing trains a model to predict the label while ______.

randomizing labels during validation

minimizing information that reveals the protected attribute

maximizing reconstruction loss

freezing all feature layers

An adversary attempts to recover the attribute; the predictor learns representations from which it is hard to infer.

A practical production step for responsible AI is ______.

hiding failure cases in internal wikis

documenting model cards with known limitations and monitoring plans

replacing fairness metrics with vanity KPIs

disabling logging to avoid audits

Model cards and monitoring create transparency and accountability for how systems behave over time.

Starter

Review fairness metrics and how to slice data by protected attributes.

Solid

You can spot bias, compare trade‑offs, and apply practical mitigations.

Expert!

You balance accuracy and equity with transparent, auditable models.

What's your reaction?

Related Quizzes

1 of 9

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *