Value Proposition Design

Visualising Value with Before–After Grids

Map the customer’s current pain to the desired after state to make value concrete. Practice turning outcomes into specific, measurable claims that persuade.

In a Before–After grid, what belongs in the AFTER column to make value concrete?

Observable outcomes with a metric and timeframe

A list of technologies used

Executive slogans

Internal activities completed

Outcome claims gain credibility when paired with a measure and time boundary, not internal tasks or slogans.

Which pairing best connects a BEFORE pain to an AFTER state?

High CAC → increase ad frequency

Slow pages → hire more SDRs

High manual rework → straight‑through processing rate ↑ to 85% in 90 days

Low NPS → add more features

A useful grid links a pain to a measurable future state. The example ties process friction to an automation outcome with a target and horizon.

Why include proof artifacts directly on the grid?

They collapse skepticism by linking the AFTER claim to evidence

They reduce the need for pricing clarity

They replace the need for discovery

They make the layout busier which signals effort

Screens, benchmarks, or customer quotes attached to outcomes de‑risk the promise and speed understanding.

What’s the most common failure when teams draft BEFORE rows?

Leaving the row blank

Mentioning competitors by name

Describing internal deliverables instead of the customer’s current reality

Using too many numbers

Teams often write what they will do, not what users experience today. A good BEFORE captures the status quo pain in the user’s words.

Which choice improves persuasion when presenting a grid to executives?

Adding more adjectives to benefits

Mapping outcomes to the exec’s KPIs and risk constraints

Using only vanity metrics

Avoiding any mention of trade‑offs

Execs decide on KPI impact under risk. Tying outcomes to their metrics and constraints increases credibility and relevance.

How should you treat qualitative outcomes (e.g., trust, clarity) on a grid?

Leave them as adjectives

Omit them entirely

Replace them with pageviews

Translate them into observable proxies like error rate or time to resolve

Qualitative benefits persuade when grounded in proxies the buyer can measure in operations or finance.

What cadence keeps a Before–After grid trustworthy post‑launch?

Quarterly review against live customer data and case studies

Ad‑hoc updates when competitors change

One‑time creation at kickoff

Annual rewrite by brand only

Regular evidence refreshes ensure claims match reality and remain credible against current deployments.

Which visualization choice most reduces cognitive load in a dense grid?

Rainbow color for each row

Left‑to‑right flow with consistent units and minimal color noise

Random order of pains

Mixed units within rows

Consistent flow and units allow fast scanning; excessive color and mixed units add friction and doubt.

Where should pricing appear when using a grid in a sales deck?

After outcomes are established, paired with the value created

As a footnote on every slide

On the first slide as a teaser

Hidden in the appendix only

Price lands best once value is vivid and quantified; then it feels like a fair exchange rather than a starting objection.

What’s the role of customer language in a grid?

Translate pains into feature names

Use internal jargon to sound expert

Avoid direct quotes to keep it tidy

Use verbatim phrasing from research to label pains and outcomes

Customer words increase resonance and perceived relevance, making the value story feel tailored and real.

Starter

Build your foundation for this topic and practice the core moves.

Solid

Good grasp—tighten your analysis and sharpen evidence.

Expert!

Outstanding mastery—your value stories and pricing stand up to scrutiny.

What's your reaction?

Related Quizzes

1 of 10

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *